A Response To Some Questions About Israel and the Church

I have lately had the pleasure of doing some theological fencing with a good Christian man named Andrew Suttles.  Andrew has raised a number of pertinent questions about Dispensational interpretations of Israel and the Church which I would like to address in this (and another post). Once again I want to state that I think “Dispensationalist” is a lousy and inaccurate name for this type of theology.  Firstly because dispensations are largely theologically mute.  Secondly, because the real crux of

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (19) – Theses 75-79

75. Despite dispensationalism’s “plain and simple” method that undergirds its millennial views, it leads to the bizarre teaching that for 1000 years the earth will be inhabited by a mixed population of resurrected saints who return from heaven with Jesus living side-by-side with non-resurrected people, who will consist of unbelievers who allegedly but unaccountably survive the Second Coming as well as those who enter the millennium from the Great Tribulation as “a new generation of believers” (Walvoord). Response: The “former

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (18) – Theses 71-74

71. Despite the dispensationalists’ claim that their so-called literalistic premillennialism is superior to the other evangelical millennial views because Revelation 20:1-6 is one text that clearly sets forth their system, this view imposes the literalistic system unjustifiably and inconsistently on the most symbolic book in all the Bible, a book containing references to scorpions with faces like men and teeth like lions (Rev 9:7), fire-breathing prophets (Rev 11:5), a seven-headed beast (Rev 13:1), and more. Response: First, it is not

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (17) – Theses 68-70

68. Contrary to dispensationalists’ view of the mark of the beast, most of them seeing in the beast’s number a series of three sixes, the Bible presents it not as three numbers (6-6-6) but one singular number (666) with the total numerical value of  “six hundred and sixty-six” (Rev 13:18b). Response:Our friends have been reading the enthusiasts again, and lumping all dispensationalists in with them.  How would they feel if we cited Harold Camping and used him as our exemplar

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (16) – Theses 61-67

61. Despite the dispensationalists’ teaching that “Jesus will come in the air secretly to rapture His Church” (Tim LaHaye), their key proof-text for this “secret” coming, 1 Thess 4:16, makes the event as publicly verifiable as can be, declaring that he will come “with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trumpet of God.” Response: By “secret” LaHaye, who is not to be thought of as an authority on the issue, meant something like “kept secret

Continue Reading

Biblical Covenants and Normative Hermeneutics (2)

In this final article in this series on the importance of the Biblical Covenants I want to outline what I believe are the important issues which ought to affect anyone who believes that the Bible should be interpreted in the same “naive” way we read personal letters, sermons, novels and other books.  We must always keep in mind that the Bible is written to the “common man” not the specialist scholar. 1. Although there are recognizable dispensations within the Bible

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (15) – Theses 57-60

57. Despite the dispensationalists’ claim that Christ could return at any minute because “there is no teaching of any intervening event” (John Walvoord), many of their leading spokesmen hold that the seven churches in Rev 2-3 “outline the present age in reference to the program in the church,” including “the Reformation” and our own age (J. D. Pentecost). Response: It is true that some dispensationalists have regarded the seven churches as a kind of prophetic outline of Church history.  But

Continue Reading

Some Mud That Sticks: A Little Insider Criticism of the Face of Dispensationalism

It is well to note that the following charges against dispensationalism are not theological and exegetical in nature, but are more psychological and sociological.  Here is my opinion: a. Pragmatism It is our opinion that dispensationalism can be (and ought to be) wedded to a full-orbed systematic world and life view, but only if it begins to take itself more seriously and starts the painful process of self-examination.[1] In order to do this it must divest itself of the pragmatic

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (14) – Theses 53-56

53. Contrary to the dispensationalists’ urging Christians to live their lives expecting Christ’s return at any moment, “like people who don’t expect to be around much longer” (Hal Lindsey), Christ characterizes those who expect his soon return as “foolish” (Matt 25:1-9), telling us to “occupy until He comes,” (Luke 19:13 ) and even discouraging his disciples’ hope in Israel’s conversion “now” by noting that they will have to experience “times or epochs” of waiting which “the Father has fixed by

Continue Reading

Answering the 95 Theses Against Dispensationalism (13) – Theses 49-52

49. Contrary to dispensationalism’s claim that Christ sincerely offered “the covenanted kingdom to Israel” as a political reality in literal fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies (J. D. Pentecost), the Gospels tell us that when his Jewish followers were “intending to come and take Him by force, to make Him king” that he “withdrew” from them (John 6:15), and that he stated that “My kingdom is not of this world. If My kingdom were of this world, then My servants would

Continue Reading

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Categories