A Consideration of New Covenant Passages (Pt. 3)

PART TWO

Let me repeat the conclusion I arrived at previously:

Jesus is the Redeemer who saves by the Spirit through the New covenant! 

Peter’s Speech at Jerusalem

As Peter is rehearsing his experience at the house of Cornelius in Acts 11 he supplies as his main argument for God bringing salvation to the Gentiles the fact that they were given the Holy Spirit. And he made a point of saying the Spirit received by the Gentiles was “the same gift as He gave us when we believed on the Lord Jesus Christ” (Acts 11:17). Here’s Peter’s conclusion:

The Gentiles (Cornelius’s household) had believed on Jesus Christ and had received the Holy Spirit; the same gift the believing Jews, the apostles first, had been given. According to Luke 22:20 Jesus initiated the New covenant in His blood with those who would become the apostles. Jesus told them,

Now, therefore, you are no longer strangers and foreigners, but fellow citizens with the saints and members of the household of God, having been built on the foundation of the apostles and prophets, Jesus Christ Himself being the chief cornerstone.

If the Church is built on the foundation of the apostles and [NT] prophets and the apostles were saved with New covenant blood is it feasible to opine that the Church is not also saved by New covenant blood? Paul goes on to say that the Ephesian Gentiles were “being built together for a dwelling place of God in the Spirit.” (Eph. 2:22 My emphasis). This would seem to confirm that the Church is indeed connected to the New covenant through the Holy Spirit on the basis of Christ’s blood of the New covenant.

What I have just argued for is that the covernance of the Church is directly related to the New covenant. And I haven’t even come to the strongest passages yet. But I believe I stand on firm enough ground widen the assertion I began with above:

Jesus is the Redeemer who saves by the Spirit both Jews and Gentiles through the New covenant! 

Isaiah 42 and 49: Crucial New Covenant Texts

I want to take a step back and return to the OT.

Dave Fredrickson tells us that he studied the expositions of Isaiah 42:6 and 49:8 in scholarship of the past and did not find many men identifying those texts with the New covenant (See Fredrickson, “Which are the New Covenant Passages in the Bible?” 29 n. 2). That is an interesting bit of information. I think, however, the matter is not too mysterious once one comprehends the mental grip Covenant Theology had upon the minds of so many Christian writers and preachers prior to the 19th Century. The “covenant” of Isaiah 42:6 and 49:8 would be viewed as (or in light of) the “covenant of grace,” as it is, for example, by John Calvin and Petrus Van Mastricht. This is an example of the damage that Covenant Theology does to the reading of the Bible via its unbiblical hermeneutics. Whatever anomalies were introduced because of Covenant Theology, nearly all commentators (including modern covenant theologians) relate these Servant songs to the New covenant. And indeed, most dispensational scholars embrace these texts as New covenant texts.

Here are the two crucial texts in Isaiah:

I shall return to the highlighted words shortly, but these texts are from the first two “Servant Songs” of Isaiah. These songs are quoted in the NT at various places and always in relation to Christ. For example, the aged Simeon exclaimed “my eyes have seen Your salvation” (Lk. 2:30). He went on to cite the Servant song in Isaiah 49:6, which refers to Jesus as,

Michael Vlach correctly divines what is happening here:

We find Paul doing something similar in Acts 26:47 where he again cites this New covenant text. Now if Paul believed he was continuing the work of the Servant of Isaiah 49:6 in his missionary activities among the Gentiles it is hard to imagine him thinking that he was pursuing non-New covenant ministry.

Leave a reply:

Your email address will not be published.

Site Footer

Sliding Sidebar

Categories